State of Washington Seal

State of Washington

Activity - Public Actions 2019



Public actions are cases that have reached a conclusion. The Commisson posts the most pertinent documents for each case on this website, but other public document may exist and are available upon request.

To view public cases that are currently open, see the Open Cases section of this website.

You may also search for cases against an individual judge.

Cases closed in the year

In re the Honorable Bruce Spanner

CJC No. 8899-F-186

November 22, 2019

From an agreed statement of facts, Benton and Franklin Counties Superior Court Judge Bruce Spanner stipulated that he violated Canon 1 (Rules 1.1 and 1.2) and Canon 2 (Rules 2.2, 2.3(A), 2.6(A) and 2.9) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Judge Spanner violated the Code by issuing a court order with judicial "findings of fact" and "conclusions of law" in a case that was not before him for a decision, and he did so on his own initiative without giving notice or an opportunity to be heard prior to entering the order. Moreover, the findings and conclusions gratuitously impugned the integrity of the attorneys involved and was not based on competent evidence, but rather on mere speculation and conjecture from what the judge described as "back hall courthouse chatter." The judge's actions denied the parties and their attorneys an opportunity to be heard, created a perception of unfairness and partiality and were improperly based in part on ex parte information. The Commission reprimanded Judge Spanner and ordered him to certify that he has read the Code of Judicial Conduct within one month and complete four hours of pre-approved judicial ethics training within one year.

In re the Honorable Timothy Fennessy

CJC No. 9014-F-184

April 26, 2019

From an agreed statement of facts, Spokane County Superior Court Judge Timothy Fennessy stipulated that he violated Canon 1 (Rules 1.1 and 1.2) and Canon 2 (Rule 2.5(A)) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Judge Fennessy violated the Code when he took more than the time permitted by the State Constitution, state statute, and the Code of Judicial Conduct in deciding two cases before him. The Commission admonished Judge Fennessy and ordered him to promptly review the Code and, for a one year period following entry of this stipulation, Respondent will affirm in writing to the Commission every three months that he has no matters with decisions pending beyond ninety days.

In re the Honorable David Meyer

CJC No. 9126-F-185

April 26, 2019

From an agreed statement of facts, former King County District Court Judge David Meyer stipulated that he violated Canon 1 (Rules 1.1 and 1.2) and Canon 2 (Rules 2.6(A), 2.8(A) and (B)) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Judge Meyer violated the Code when, during two hearings for Anti-Harassment Orders, he was unnecessarily confrontational, unreasonably limited the litigants' presentations of their respective cases, criticized a domestic violence survivor for her choice in relationships, and laughed at a response of a lawyer who was present for one of the hearings. Judge Meyer indicated that he believed this was a one-time lapse in appropriate demeanor and also noted that it occurred during what he described as a long and difficult calendar. The Commission admonished Judge Meyer and ordered him to promptly review the Code and complete two hours of courtroom demeanor training before resuming judicial service.