|
Where applicable, the following public
cases may include Commission decisions, statements of charges, answers
to statements of charges, exhibits, and/or supreme court decisions. These
documents are available for download as Adobe Acrobat PDF files.
In re the Honorable Andrew L.
Monson
| CJC No. 92-1238-F-36 |
October 2,
1992 |
Pursuant to a stipulation and agreement
with the judge, the Commission admonished a judge who did not enter
a timely decision in a small claims case. The judge was also ordered
to review the court rules and govern his conduct in accordance with
them.
Stipulation,
Agreement and Order of Admonishment filed 10/2/1992.
In re the Honorable John Feutz
| CJC No. 92-1248-F-35 |
October 2,
1992 |
Pursuant to a stipulation and agreement
with a judge, the Commission admonished a judge for failing in 5 cases
to enter judgment within 15 days as required by court rules. The stipulation
also stated that the judge's delay was caused in part, by an involuntary,
temporary, disabling condition, and that knowing of his condition, the
judge accepted and attempted to perform his duties when it was incumbent
upon him to temporarily withdraw from assuming additional judicial duties.
The judge was ordered to review the applicable court rules and govern
his conduct in accordance with them.
Stipulation,
Agreement and Order of Admonishment filed 10/2/1992.
In re the
Honorable Ralph G. Turco
| CJC No. 92-1259-30 |
October 2,
1992 |
Pursuant to a stipulation and agreement
with the judge, the Commission censured a judge who had tossed a coin
to decide a traffic infraction and entered a finding against the defendant
when the defendant lost the coin toss. The judge was ordered to review
the provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct and the court traffic
infraction rules.
Stipulation
and Order filed 10/2/1992.
Answer
to Statement of Charges filed 6/15/1992.
Statement
of Charges filed 6/10/1992.
In re the Honorable Steve M .
Clough
| CJC No. 91-1229-F-32 |
September
4, 1992 |
Pursuant to the stipulation of the
judge, the Commission admonished a judge who had audibly stated on the
record about a defendant on a traffic charge, "You don't think
Mr. Breckenridge drives around baiting officers do ya, just hoping to
get stopped so he can get a little debate going. What it looks like
to me." The judge agreed to accept the admonishment and the Commission's
determination that the conduct was a violation of the Code of Judicial
Conduct and agreed not to engage in such conduct in the future.
Stipulation,
Agreement and Order of Admonishment filed 9/4/1992.
In re the
Honorable Stanley K. Bruhn
| CJC No. 91-1113-31 |
August 7,
1992 |
Pursuant to a stipulation, the Commission
publicly admonished a judge for tolerating inappropriate and disruptive
demeanor and comments by defense counsel in a case, demonstrating a
lack of patience and courtesy towards defense counsel when taxed by
their behavior, and making inappropriate comments to one of the defense
counsel when the attorney was in the courtroom during another case.
Stipulation,
Agreement and Order of Admonishment filed 8/7/1992.
In re the Honorable Harry R.
Slusher
| CJC No. 91-1205-F-28 |
April 3, 1992 |
The Commission and a family law
commissioner stipulated that, after becoming a commissioner, the commissioner
had attempted to secure funds for his former client from which he would
have been paid by communicating with an attorney for the other party
to the matter and that that action constituted the practice of law.
The commissioner agreed not to engage in such conduct in the future.
Stipulation
and Agreement filed 4/3/1992.
In re the Honorable Gary W. Velie
| CJC No. 90-946-F-29 |
February 7,
1992 |
The Commission reprimanded a judge
who 1) had had an ex parte meeting with a minor who was the subject
of a proceeding over which the judge was presiding; 2) had stated to
an attorney in open court and in front of a female court reporter and
female clerk that the attorney looked like he had been "jacking
off a bobcat in a phone booth;" 3) during the armed conflict with
Iraq, said "nuke the sand niggers" in the presence of others
in the clerk's office coffee room in the courthouse; 4) had stated to
two attorneys that a defendant in an old case "had gone crazy from
sucking too many cocks," which made one of the attorney concerned
that the judge may be prejudiced against homosexuals; and 5) during
sentencing of an indigent defendant, had stated that a lot of the clients
at a food bank of which his wife is president "were too stupid
to cook what they are given but nobody is starving." In 1988, the
Commission had dismissed allegations of racist and sexist language,
embarrassing jokes, and ex parte contacts against the judge based on
his statements to the Commission that he would take corrective action.
The Commission found that the judge frequently used coarse language
that, when viewed in isolation, was relatively minor, but contributed
to the pattern of inappropriate behavior and that the judge's misconduct
had had a negative effect on the judiciary and caused concern about
his impartiality on the part of attorneys who appear before him. The
Commission also ordered the judge to cease making disparaging or embarrassing
comments while in the performance of official duties and while in and
about the courthouse regardless whether such comments are made in jest;
to refrain from ex parte communications; to take no retaliation, directly
or indirectly, against witnesses or other persons who cooperated with
the Commission in its investigation and proceeding; to complete a course
approved by the Commission concerning judicial conduct at the National
Judicial College within one year; and to cooperate with the Commission's
monitoring of his compliance with the order. Several members of the
Commission dissented from the finding that the judge had made a homophobic
comment, noting that the judge could not recall it and another person
present had denied that it was made, and from the finding regarding
the ex parte communication because the judge's suggestion that the minor
confer with him, although improper, was made in open court and counsel
did not object.
Letter of Completion filed 2/8/1993.
Commission
Decision filed 2/7/1992.
Answer
to Amended Statement of Charges filed 10/30/1991.
Amended
Statement of Charges filed 10/9/1991.
Answer
to Statement of Charges filed 9/12/1991.
Statement
of Charges filed 8/16/1991.
|